Multimedia Gallery

WOW!!! It looks great!! I love how it turned out, great job!!

the greens blend too much, try a different shade or possibly a different color. still looks great

Ohhh! So nice I love pics with backgrounds. You dont see them enough...

Wow, excellent tinkering. Try a different shade of green for the background, though; it's hard to make out Link from the rest of the pic.

good work. i'm too tired to comment further, sorry, i'll say more later.

*holy instant comments!* Yeah, I was actually tring to match the green, but I see what you're saying. That's nice that you like it, but I was looking for really critical comments (especially from you KR!) so that the actually finished product could be perfect. What do you think about the belt? Was the drop shadow-ish effect good? DId I smooth the colored-pencil marks nicely? Notice the bottom part, how it fades out as opposed to the thick black outline around the rest of him: that was so annoying. I couldn't get the white out of there so I faded it out. I tried to maintain ML's sig, but it faded a little as well. I'm tempted not to try and do any more, but I want it to be absolutely perfect. What would make it better?

Perhaps a dark back drop with lighter orbs of light floating around (like in the Kokiri Forest), and a bit more shading on the leggings and arms, etc.

Wow! That's awesome, dudeofrandomness. I swear I need Photoshop

In my professional opionion i would have to suggest the matter of inconclusitivity, you see... well you need more of the perogative of the negative solution without the sudden mural of integrity. That and the black outline around him makes it look kinda dumb, and inside his shirt is kinda ruffled and bad, and well lets face it random dude i cant tell the difference between the bg, and Link. You wanted to know what you needed to fix and there it is, now get going on your masterpiece

wow nice coloring. and uh.. its nice. it is also good. ....

WOOOOOOOOWW~ That's cool!!

Oohhh, wait till you see...Check out the new one I'm about to upload. I have fixed the background so its mixed green and blue, but its not a significant change from this one, so Im not posting that one. But the other one... genius (or luck)

DTE, i can outword you any day of the week, and mine'll use real words. though the bulk of you comment was accurate and insightful, the opening sentence boiled down to nothing.

No one doubts you, KR. It wuold be nice to see the other pic, no matter how slight the change would be, DoR.

*challenges KR* lets see what you've got, i doubt you could even match the powers of my absolute inteligence squared. Obviously the matter of the fact is innacurate, and unjust yet it mostly protrays the theorum of realativity to the final result and is indefinetly WRONG!!!

and for KR for being so, himself. If Nem. really wants to see it...I guess I could post the other one. Pretty much all I changed was the background. I enhanced the color a *tiny* bit as well, but it's probably not even noticeable. I'll post it sometime...but not for a couple days probably (cuz im laZ)

ph34r me DTE. ph34r my intense and manifold plethora of alphanumeric arrangements which are generally constituted as words but a small percentage of the educated population occasionally is not entirely certain thereof. however, considering the miniscule size and relative intelligence (j/k) of this community of laudeers, i have little to preoccupy myself with, in regards of the verity of my vocabulary and grammatic usage.

In my theory, i would have to suggest the use of Methylchloroisothaizolinone is in-humain because of the existince of partical beings which coincide with the whole theorum of Joliot-Curies'. Obvilously they create a negative effect with all of the positron-emitting isotopes involved in the situation and must be superimposed until both the Y-value and X-value can be equal in length. In conclusion Methylchloroisothaizolinone is accuminically too exhausting in the retrospective perspective and must therefore be taken off the market.

are you speaking of atomics or a drug? your word choice strongly indicates both, but is not definative in either direction. now i'm off to get more c0ff33.

light green? whatevs. Personally I find that the sum of the square of the standard deviations of two combined distributions equals the square of the new standard deviation for the resulting distribution. (we should totally take this conversation into a forum)

sorry i didn't clairify in big bold letters that i was talking about the drug Methyllchloroisothaizolinone

Wow, a lot of confusing words. Oddly, almost understandable. And KR, I would like to defend mine and my colleagues' miniscule in size and relative intelligence (or lack thereof), by saying we're not as dumb as you may consider us to be; we know how to read the captions on LoZ.

I was just about to suggest the same thing, except for i would have done it in 3D *goes on a quest for food (at random dude's house)*

*just barely realizes that c0ff33 isn't a hexadecimal color notation, its a caffienated **spelling! ** beverage* *skrags dte b4 he gets to my house*

*air-dodge* yea the food is mine!!!

*air dodges don't last long enough to escape a skrag*

I am Kirby, so i will get near the edge and not just use cheapness, but extreme cheapness and let you die by way of mouth

ummm okaaay.....let's get back to the pic OK? very nice pic random dude!

We really should take the "Geniusocity Talking" to a forum, WHERE I WOULD RULE... the forum... BUT I WOULD DEFINETLY RULE... the forum...

Okay dudeofrandomness I'm confused...who's artwork is that? Did you and MagaLink work together? Cool...artists helping artists.

.....cool...............................................

Personally I feel there is nothing in particular wrong with this artwork. the overall effect of the graphics coincides with the original artwork. OH YESH! hahahaha